Source Feed: National Post
Author: Catherine Lévesque
Publication Date: May 29, 2025 - 11:10
Carney says he ‘welcomes’ tariff decision by U.S. trade court but urges caution
May 29, 2025

OTTAWA — Canada is breathing a cautious sigh of relief after
the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled
that U.S. President Donald Trump does not have the authority to impose sweeping tariffs or fentanyl-related duties on its trading partners.
Prime Minister Mark Carney shared his position in the House of Commons, where he delivered remarks on the debate in reply to the speech from the throne.
“The government welcomes yesterday’s decision by the U.S. Court of International Trade which is consistent with Canada’s longstanding position that the U.S. IEEPA (International Emergency Economic Powers Act) tariffs were unlawful as well as unjustified,” he said.
“That said, we recognize that our trading relationship with the United States is still profoundly and adversely threatened and affected by similarly unjustified 232 tariffs against steel, aluminum and the auto sector, as well as continuing threats of tariffs against other strategic sectors including lumber, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals.”
The court decision, delivered on Wednesday, marks the first major legal pushback to Trump’s broad use of tariffs to upend global trade. But Carney hinted that Canada does not intend to rest on its laurels and must diversify its trading relations with other allies.
“It therefore remains the top priority of Canada’s new government to establish a new economic and security relationship with the United States and to strengthen our collaboration with reliable trading partners and allies around the world,” he said.
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said in a statement on X the fact that the court has struck down tariffs on some Canadian goods is “good news” and urged similar caution.
“We need true free trade — so workers earn more, prices fall, and businesses boom on both sides of the border,” he wrote.
“But we can no longer put all our eggs in the U.S. basket. Too risky. Canada must fire up free enterprise to build pipelines, powerlines, ports, rail, roads, and tech — so we are strong, self-reliant and sovereign for a change.”
Trump hit Canada with economy-wide tariffs in March after he declared an emergency at the northern border related to the flow of fentanyl.
More to come…
National Post,
with additional reporting by the Canadian Press
calevesque@postmedia.com
Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.
Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.
British Columbia’s Energy Minister has shut down the idea of a new pipeline in the province, citing the impracticality and massive costs associated with such a proposal. Adrian Dix’s comments follow Monday’s first ministers’ meeting in Saskatoon, in which talk of “nation-building” energy projects dominated. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has been pushing for the revival of the Northern Gateway pipeline project, which would have moved bitumen from Alberta to the northern coast of B.C.
June 4, 2025 - 22:45 | Andrea Woo | The Globe and Mail
Two young men living in a Vancouver suburb have been charged in connection with the daytime killing of a trucking insurance broker outside his Mississauga, Ont., office last month.But his family still wants to see more charges laid in the slaying of a man once targeted in a wave of extortions that has rattled Sikh people across Canada.
June 4, 2025 - 22:40 | Mike Hager | The Globe and Mail
A border security bill tabled this week by the federal government would grant CSIS, the police and other law enforcement agencies the right to demand information about internet subscribers – including their locations – without a warrant from a judge.The proposed changes, part of a sprawling piece of legislation unveiled on Tuesday, were criticized by civil liberties advocates and legal experts, who argued that the measures would run counter to previous court rulings and would almost certainly face new challenges.
June 4, 2025 - 22:27 | Marie Woolf | The Globe and Mail
Comments
Be the first to comment